筆電開箱強人會

2018-05-05 03:00

AUTONOMY? A professor called for better protection of students and teachers, while the KMT accused the DPP of advocating free speech while intervening in school affairsBy Wu Po-hsuan, Sean Lin and Sherry Hsiao / Staff reporters, with staff writerVerbal clashes erupted on National Taiwan University’s （NTU） campus yesterday between students who support the election of Kuan Chung-ming （管中閔） as university president and those who oppose it.The Ministry of Education on Friday last week rejected Kuan’s election after a series of allegations, ranging from conflicts of interest in the selection process to plagiarism and teaching in China, prevented Kuan from taking office as scheduled on Feb. 1.The Action Alliance for University Autonomy, formed by a number of academics who support Kuan, held a rally on the campus near the landmark Fu Bell （傅鐘）. Former president Ma Ying-jeou （馬英九） and former Chinese Nationalist Party （KMT） chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu （洪秀柱） visited the campus to show their solidarity with faculty members and students supporting Kuan.Ma said that a university should not be polluted by politics, while Hung joined a sit-in.At about 4pm, more than 20 NTU students who oppose Kuan’s election raised banners near the bell that read: “Kuan’s purity cheated the entire country.”As the two sides traded barbs, a Kuan-supporter pulled the shirt collar of an anti-Kuan student, while another person drew on a student’s white shirt using lipstick.At one point, anti-Kuan students were cornered by people supporting the president-elect.Some Kuan supporters were heard shouting: “Students get off the campus,” “Red Guards” and “Japanese lackey （日本走狗）.”Campus police intervened, separating the two parties to prevent the conflict from escalating.NTU professor Chen Tung-sheng （陳東升） later yesterday said that if the university wants to ensure school autonomy, the first step would be to protect the personal safety of NTU students and teachers, and their freedom to express different opinions inside the campus.“NTU students were beaten for expressing their opinion inside their own school — this is a very serious matter and the darkest day in NTU’s history,” Chen said.The university’s acting president and administrative units must be held responsible for what happened and the people who used violence should be strongly condemned, he added.Earlier yesterday, KMT lawmakers rallied outside the ministry to protest the ministry’s decision not to confirm Kuan as NTU president.“On the 99th anniversary of the May Fourth Movement （五 四運動）, the Democratic Progressive Party [DPP] administration has crossed the red line of democracy and academic freedom,” KMT caucus secretary-general Lee Yen-hsiu （李彥秀） said, referring to an intellectual and reformist movement in China.The DPP has advocated against allowing politics to interfere in school affairs, but the charges it has fabricated against Kuan show that its so-called ideals are just tools for political struggle, Lee said.School autonomy is crucial for young people to cultivate democratic values, and the KMT caucus wants to show its support for student protesters who yesterday took a stand on the issue at the NTU to let the DPP and the ministry know that they must not tread on the nation’s hard-won democracy and freedom, she said.KMT caucus whip Lin Te-fu （林德福） accused President Tsai Ing-wen （蔡英文） and Premier William Lai （賴清德） of being the masterminds behind the ministry’s decision not to confirm Kuan.The caucus did not stage the rally to rescue Kuan, but to call for support for university autonomy and democracy, KMT caucus deputy secretary-general William Tseng （曾銘宗） said.There are 140 NTU faculty members who are also independent board directors, and most of them took up their posts in the private sector before informing the school — like what Kuan did when he accepted the Taiwan Mobile seat, Tseng said.Lai yesterday told legislators that he would “take responsibility” for the ministry’s decision against confirming Kuan.He made the remarks in response to KMT Legislator Alicia Wang’s （王育敏） question on whether the ministry had acted on his or Tsai’s orders, or whether the premier gave the order without first informing the president.Lai said that, as the premier, he is responsible for the appointment of ministers, as well as the decisions they make.Additional reporting by CNA新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES

民進黨立委李俊俋今(4)日表示，考試委員從 2014 年 9 月上任以來，竟然有多名試委多次赴大陸講學，甚至出任客座教授，或接受兼任教授等職務，他質疑這些月領 19 萬元的試委「是不是太閒？」

李俊俋表示，他查出考試委員李選從 2014 年至今，前往大陸 17 次，並獲聘為蘇州大學護理學院、吉林大學護理學院客座教授；試委王亞男也 13 次赴陸，並出任北華大學名譽教授；試委詹中原赴陸雖然只有 5 次，但卻被公開列在武漢大學政治與公共管理學院官網，名義為兼課教授；至於試委趙麗雲則是以宗教交流的名義，與中央統戰部國家宗教事務局多次合作，李俊俋覺得有問題。

李俊俋指出，依據《台灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例》第 9 條規定，公務員與政務官如果要前往大陸，必須先向內政部申請許可，考試委員更必須經國安局等行政部會所組成的審查會同意後才能赴陸。

李俊俋說，他發函給考試院，得到的回文答覆是「考試院不同意考試委員赴陸兼職、兼課」，他質疑考試院沒了解真實狀況，他要求考試院應在一周內調查與說明。

李俊俋說，《公務人員服務法》第 14 之 3 條也明定，公務員兼任教學或研究工作，應經服務機關許可。他指出，試委月領 19 萬元高薪，等同部長級待遇，但卻不務正業，天天赴陸講課、違法兼課，「是不是太閒？」

在此次F8開發者大會開始前，Facebook執行長Mark Zuckerberg便先預告準備推出名為「Clear History」的機制，讓使用者更容易了解個人隱私被哪些網站、App使用，並且可更直覺地關閉，同時在整個主題演講活動過程裡也持續強調著重個人隱私，甚至拿自己日前接受諮詢時的影片開玩笑，強調未來希望不要再發生一樣的情況。 分享 facebook 由於年初受到Cambridge Analytica竊取用戶隱私，讓Facebook面臨負面形象問題，不少人開始質疑Facebook在隱私安全處理並未替用戶著想。因此在此次F8開發者大會中，隱私安全問題自然成為主要關注議題。.inline-ad { position: relative; overflow: hidden; box-sizing: border-box; }

.inline-ad div { margin: auto; text-align: center; }

.inline-ad iframe { margin: auto; display: block; /*width: auto !important;*/ }

.inline-ad div[id^=google_ads_iframe] {

padding: 50px 0 30px;

}

.inline-ad div[id^=google_ads_iframe]:before {

content: "推薦";

font-size:13px;

color:#999;

text-align:left;

border-top: 1px solid #d9d9d9;

width: 100%;

position: absolute;

top: 15px;

left: 0;

padding-top: 5px;

}

.inline-ad div[id^=google_ads_iframe]:after {

content: "";

border-bottom: 1px solid #d9d9d9;

width: 100%;

position: absolute;

bottom: 15px;

left: 0;

}

.innity-apps-reset { padding: 20px 0 0 !important; margin: -20px auto -10px !important; } 在主題演講開始過程，Mark Zuckerberg便重申將強化隱私安全保護，同時也針對各地區重大選舉活動強化杜絕假新聞、假帳號操作行為，同時也會避免使用者透過不當手法場作人氣，獲取更大互動率，同時也將藉由「Clear History」等新機制讓使用者更容易控管個人隱私被使用情況，甚至讓使用者個人隱私可在不同應用服務內獲得相同安全保護。同時，在Instagram新功能中，Facebook也加入不當言論過濾、封鎖特定帳號等功能，避免產生網路欺凌現象，而在WhatsApp服務更是強調著重用戶隱私安全。Facebook資安長Alex Stamos更在活動上表示，Facebook基於目前協助串連更多人互動的發展規模，更應肩負更大社會責任確保用戶隱私被完善保護，同時也強調確保人工智慧、虛擬實境等新技術應用發展不會危及用戶隱私。Alex Stamos認為如何確保用戶隱私在每一個使用環節均能被安全保護，對Facebook而言將是相當大的挑戰，但也是如今的Facebook應肩負責任。同時，Alex Stamos也強調Facebook的長遠目標是希望藉由新技術更安全地保護用戶隱私，而非只是針對既有問題尋找解決方式，更希望能以本身經驗建立市場參考範本，讓更多科技業者也能透過類似經驗確保各自用戶隱私安全。不過，當Facebook將平台化的Messenger導入更多廣告宣傳功能，同時也在WhatsApp增加更多在地商業應用服務，甚至在Facebook加入更多「團體」應用功能，以及新增「約會」媒合服務，或許將使Facebook在用戶隱私安全保護部分必須花費更多心思，否則可能再度引來更大社會撻伐?